A game-theoretic analysis of competition among container port hubs: the case of Busan and Shanghai 1
By Christopher M. Anderson, Yong-an Park, Young-Tae Chang, Chang-Ho Yang, Tae-Woo Lee, M. Luo. 2008
124 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/719b1f34445ff6acdddbe24fd220accbe8f3ddbd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Environmental Engineering
In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- A game theoretical analysis of port competition (2013, methodology): “Anderson et al. (2008b) use a two-player strategic game, in which every player has two actions, to understand how each competing port would respond to the development of the rival port, and whether the port would be able to capture or defend market share by building additional capacity, especially…”
- Dynamics of liner shipping network and port connectivity in supply chain systems: analysis on East Asia (2011, background): “…contestability in container handling market (Notteboom, 2002), game theory assessing port operators’ strategies (Yang, 1999; Flor and Defilippi, 2003; Anderson et al., 2008), cluster analysis taking into account wide range of factors deemed to influence port competitiveness (De Langen, 2002) as…”