Estimation of Thermal Conductivity of Nanofluid Using Experimental Effective Particle Volume

461 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Nanofluids for Solar Collector Applications: A Review (2014, unknown): “Ref [62] CuO- H2O Si O2- H2O Diamond-Ethylene glycol 8-15 15-20 30-50 0.”
The Classical Nature of Thermal Conduction in Nanofluids (2008, background): “Current Study [13] En ha nc em en t i n κ (% )”
Thermal conductance of nanofluids: is the controversy over? (2008, background): “The thermal conductivity data are taken from (Choi et al. 2001; Das et al. 2003; Eapen et al. 2007c; Eastman et al. 1997; Eastman et al. 2001; Hwang et al. 2007; Kang et al. 2006; Lee et al. 1999 ;L i and Peterson 2006; Masuda et al. 1993; Murshed et al. 2005, 2006; Patel et al. 2003; Shaikh et al”
Natural convection from a vertical permeable cone in a nanofluid saturated porous media for uniform heat and nanoparticles volume fraction fluxes (2012, methodology): “Kang et al. (2006) studied estimation of the thermal conductivity of a nanofluid using experimental effective particle volume.”
Latest developments on the viscosity of nanofluids (2012, background): “having different contents including heat transfer enhancement [5–7], thermal conductivity measurement [8–10], thermal conductivity enhancement [11–21], effective thermal conductivity [22– 28], thermal conductivity of suspensions [29–31], thermal properties enhancement [32], thermal transport [33], t”