The amenity value of the climate: the household production function approach

By David J. Maddison. 2003

124 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/716dfd34f30db949dc204909fc40e2e02b23c013

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

The Economic Impacts of Climate Change (2018, background): “Thirteen of the twenty-two studies listed in table 1 include estimates of the regional impacts of climate change and, in the case of the Maddison (2003), Rehdanz and Maddison (2005), and Maddison and Rehdanz (2011), national impact estimates.”
The Social Cost of Carbon: Trends, Outliers and Catastrophes (2008, unknown): “The 200 estimates of the marginal costs of climate change are based on a dozen of estimates of the total costs of climate change (Cline, 1992; Fankhauser, 1995; Maddison, 2003; Mendelsohn et al., 2000; Nordhaus, 1991, 1994, 2006; Nordhaus and Boyer, 2000; Nordhaus and Yang, 1996; Rehdanz and Maddiso”
The GDP-Temperature relationship: Implications for climate change damages (2021, unknown): “This enumerative method contrasts with the statistical method employed by Mendelsohn et al. (2000a) and Mendelsohn et al. (2000b) and later Maddison (2003) and Nordhaus (2006) that inferred climate change costs from variation in economic activity across climates.”
The Economic Effects of Climate Change (2009, methodology): “Studies by Nordhaus (2006) and Maddison (2003) use versions of the statistical approach as well.”
Effects of long-term climate change on global building energy expenditures (2018, background): “…demand in Europe (Eskeland and Mideksa, 2009), on the constant utility cost of living in 88 different countries based on a household production function framework (Maddison, 2003), and on the value of amenities in more than two thousand U.S. regions based on a hedonic method (Albouy et al., 2013).”
The Amenity Value of Climate to German Households (2004, methodology): “Maddison (2003) uses the household production function approach to explain differences in international patterns of consumption partially in terms of climatic differences, deriving an estimate of the welfare impact of climate change.”
The marginal damage costs of carbon-dioxide emissions’ (2005, background): “However, studies may also have overlooked positive impacts of climate change (e.g., on amenity; Maddison, 2003; Maddison and Bigano, 2003) and not adequately accounted for how development could reduce impacts of climate change.”
A social cost of carbon for (almost) every country (2019, methodology): “, 2000, Nordhaus, 2006), household expenditure (Maddison, 2003), selfreported happiness (Rehdanz and Maddison, 2005, Maddison and Rehdanz, 2011) or sectorspecific indicators (Mendelsohn et al.”
Why Worry about Climate Change? A Research Agenda (2008, unknown): “Also within each impact category, the assessment is incomplete.”
The impact of climate on life satisfaction (2011, unknown): “Examples of the household production function approach applied to climate include Maddison (2001b) and Maddison (2003).”
Targets for global climate policy: an overview (2013, background): “Maddison (2003); Mendelsohn et al. (2000a) (2000b) and Nordhaus (2006) used observed variations (across space) in prices and expenditures to discern the effect of climate.”