Evaluating Environmental Scenes Using Dynamic Versus Static Displays

By Harry Heft, Jack L. Nasar. 2000

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Sociology and Political Science, Speech and Hearing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/716b1801574d51cdeb1195cd066f8b6047cd82f9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

1. Laura S. Kropscott
2. A. Bryce
3. T. Herzog
4. Jennifer A. Flynn-Smith
5. A. Stamps
6. Ke-Tsung Han
7. R. Berto

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Lisa J. Jorgensen
2. G. Ellis
3. T. Herzog
4. E. Ruddell

In Speech and Hearing

1. Laura S. Kropscott
2. T. Herzog

Citations in the corpus

• Preference and Perceived Danger as a Function of the Perceived Curvature, Length, and Width of Urban Alleys (2001, background): “Although legitimate concerns about the generality of results from this medium of presentation have been raised (e.g., Heft & Nasar, 2000; Hetherington, Daniel, & Brown, 1993; Scott & Canter, 1997), the validity of the medium for aggregate results and static visual attributes of environments is…”
• Fear Perceptions in Public Parks (2013, background): “In addition, other fields considering environmental cues have begun to move away from photographic representations of sites to more interactive, simulated types of measurements (Heft & Nasar, 2000; Wang & Taylor, 2006) that represent a more “real” experience.”
• Preference and Perceived Danger in Field/Forest Settings (2002, background): “Although concerns about the generality of results from this medium of presentation have been raised (e.g., Heft & Nasar, 2000; Hetherington, Daniel, & Brown, 1993; Scott & Canter, 1997), the validity of the medium for aggregate results and static visual attributes of environments is strongly…”
• Mystery and Preference in Within-Forest Settings (2007, background): “Third, use of color slides to present environmental settings may raise concerns (e.g., Heft & Nasar, 2000; Scott & Canter, 1997), but the validity of the medium for aggregate results and static visual attributes of environments is supported (e.g., Hershberger & Cass, 1973; Hull & Stewart, 1992;…”
• Legibility, Mystery, and Visual Access as Predictors of Preference and Perceived Danger in Forest Settings without Pathways (2004, background): “Although concerns about the generality of results from this medium of presentation have been raised (e.g., Heft & Nasar, 2000; Hetherington, Daniel, & Brown, 1993; Scott & Canter, 1997), the validity of the medium for aggregate results and static visual attributes of environments is strongly…”