A stochastic frontier model of the productive efficiency of Korean container terminals

206 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

When it comes to container port efficiency, are all developing regions equal? (2016, background): “…Brazilian port terminals 2009 Yan et al. (2009) World’s major container ports 1997–2004 González and Trujillo (2008) Spanish container ports 1990–2000 Cullinane and Song (2003) European container ports 2003 Barros (2005) Portuguese ports 1990–2000 Tongzon and Heng (2005) World container…”
Trajectories of efficiency measurement: A bibliometric analysis of DEA and SFA (2015, background): “…on the profitability of IC (Greene and Segal, 2004) 15 (44.12) 19 (55.88) III.3 Container ports (182 / 17.32 / 10.72) Private sector, deregulation policies (Cullinane and Song, 2003); Additionally port size (Cullinane et al., 2002) DEA and SFA to compare results of important influential…”
The efficiency of European container ports: A cross-sectional data envelopment analysis (2006, background): “Finally, Cullinane and Song (2003) assessed the success achieved by Korea’s port privatisation policies in increasing the productive efficiency of its container terminals.”
Efficiency Measurement in the Port Industry: A Survey of the Empirical Evidence (2009, methodology): “Liu (1995) and Cullinane and Song (2003) define input capital as the net value of fixed capital.”