Linking Trust to Trustworthiness

By O. O’neill. 2018

169 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract Trust is valuable when placed in trustworthy agents and activities, but damaging or costly when (mis)placed in untrustworthy agents and activities. So it is puzzling that much contemporary work on trust – such as that based on polling evidence – studies generic attitudes of trust in types of agent, institution or activity in complete abstraction from any account of trustworthiness. Information about others’ generic attitudes of trust or mistrust that take no account of evidence whether those attitudes are well or ill placed can offer little or no help for those who aim to place or refuse trust well. Information about attitudes is evidently useful to those who aim to influence those who hold them, which explains why polls about attitudes are popular with political parties, advertisers and other campaigning organisations. But where we aim not to influence others, but to place and refuse trust intelligently we must link trust to trustworthiness, and must focus on evidence of honesty, competence and reliability.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Philosophy

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. Adrian Weller
  2. Prasanna Sattigeri
  3. Shubham Sharma
  4. Peter Eckersley
  5. Joydeep Ghosh

In Philosophy

  1. Yunhan Jia
  2. Q. Liao
  3. Adrian Weller
  4. Peter Eckersley

Citations in the corpus