Household Income Dynamics in Two Transition Economies

By Michael Lokshin, M. Ravallion. 2004

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7166afad598ca26d7717705ca2483271386c34bf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Christopher B. Barrett
2. Michael R. Carter
3. L. McBride
4. Teevrat Garg
5. L. Serven
6. J. H. López
7. William F. Maloney
8. Lena Giesbert

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Christopher B. Barrett
2. Teevrat Garg
3. L. McBride
4. Lena Giesbert
5. Kati Schindler
6. Michael R. Carter
7. L. Serven
8. William F. Maloney

In Soil Science

1. Teevrat Garg
2. Christopher B. Barrett
3. L. McBride
4. Michael R. Carter
5. Lena Giesbert
6. Kati Schindler
7. Aart C. Kraay
8. William F. Maloney

Citations in the corpus

• Earnings Mobility and Measurement Error: A Pseudo‐Panel Approach (2005, unknown): “We 18Recent exceptions are Lokshin and Ravallion (2004) and Duval-Hernández (2006).”
• Poverty traps and nonlinear income dynamics with measurement error and individual heterogeneity (2005, unknown): “Such an approach is followed by Lybbert et al. (2004), who use 17 3However, see Dasgupta (1997) for a critique of empirical studies of the nutrition-based efficiency wage model.”
• Poverty Reduction and Growth: Virtuous and Vicious Circles (2006, background): “Two possible dynamics can lead to poverty traps, as suggested by the figure, taken loosely from Lokshin and Ravallion (2004). In the left panel, there are increasing returns to scale up to Yu and decreasing returns to scale thereafter.”
• Poverty Traps, Aid, and Growth (2005, background): “A different type of microeconometric evidence can be found in Lokshin and Ravallion (2004), who empirically estimate nonlinear dynamics in household income in two transition economies.”
• The Economics of Poverty Traps and Persistent Poverty: Empirical and Policy Implications (2013, unknown): “…Adato , Carter & May, 2006; Antman & McKenzie, 2007; Barrett et al., 2006a; Carter, Little, Mogues, & Negatu, 2007; Jalan & Ravallion, 2005; Lokshin & Ravallion, 2004; Lybbert, Barrett, Desta, & Coppock, 2004; McKenzie & Woodruff, 2006; Van Campenhout & Dercon, 2009) are actually tests for…”
• Well-Being Dynamics and Poverty Traps (2016, methodology): “In a parametric analysis using income data, Lokshin & Ravallion (2004) find no evidence of poverty traps in Russia and Hungary in the 1990s.”
• Assets, Shocks, and Poverty Traps in Rural Mozambique (2012, background): “Lokshin, Michael and Ravallion, Martin (2002), 'Household Income Dynamics in Two Transition Economies', Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics, 8 (3).”
• The economics of poverty traps and persistent poverty: An asset-based approach (2006, background): “See for example, Adato, Carter and May (this volume), Barrett et al. (this volume), Dercon (2004), Elbers et al. (2002), Jalan and Ravallion (2002, 2004), Lokshin and Ravallion (2002), Lybbert et al. (2004), Ravallion and Jalan (1996).”
• Why do people stay poor? (2020, unknown): “…our structural analysis allows us to explore a different mechanism than the one that these studies consider in the context of pastoralists, for example, the non-linear dynamics being driven by the fact that herders need a minimum amount of cows to be geographically mobile (Lybbert et al. (2004)).”