Hilbert schemes, polygraphs and the Macdonald positivity conjecture
By Mark D. Haiman. 2000
559 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We study the isospectral Hilbert scheme X_n, defined as the reduced fiber product of C^2n with the Hilbert scheme H_n of points in the plane, over the symmetric power S^n C^2. We prove that X_n is normal, Cohen-Macaulay, and Gorenstein, and hence flat over H_n. We derive two important consequences. (1) We prove the strong form of the "n! conjecture" of Garsia and the author, giving a representation-theoretic interpretation of the Kostka-Macdonald coefficients K_{lambda,mu}(q,t). This establishes the Macdonald positivity conjecture, that K_{lambda,mu}(q,t) is always a polynomial with non-negative integer coefficients. (2) We show that the Hilbert scheme H_n is isomorphic to the Hilbert scheme of orbits C^2n//S_n, in such a way that X_n is identified with the universal family over C^2n//S_n.
Subfields: Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7161f8caad41883dbb75bb758bb4e90446815d3f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Geometry and Topology
In Mathematical Physics
In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
Citations in the corpus
- A Compositional Shuffle Conjecture Specifying Touch Points of the Dyck Path (2010, background): “at (2.4) f[X+ z] = X k0 zk(h? k f)[X]; (2.5) f[X z] = X k0 ( z)k(e? k f)[X]: In addition we will refer to the form of the Macdonald basis H~ [X;q;t] that is relevant to the study of the n! Theorem [Hai01] and the q;t-Catalan numbers. The relation of this basis to the integral form J [X;q;t] of [Mac9”
- Rational Cherednik algebras and Hilbert schemes (2004, methodology): “is much more subtle as it is difficult to keep close control of the filtration on Bij . Our proof leans heavily on the work of Haiman [ Ha3 ,Ha4] surrounding the n! and polygraph theorems and the strategy is outlined in more detail in (6.6).”
- A Combinatorial Formula for Nonsymmetric Macdonald Polynomials (2008, methodology): “In fact, we gave two formulas, one for the transformed Macdonald polynomials H̃μ(x; q, t), which appear in the positivity theorem of [8] and are connected to the geometry of Hilbert schemes, and another [6, Proposition 8.”
- Affine Insertion and Pieri Rules for the Affine Grassmannian (2006, methodology): “The cyclic components of A are [9, 1], [3, 4] and [6, 6] and we have cA = (s1s0s9)(s4s3)(s6) = (s4s3)(s1s0s9)(s6) = · · · .”
- Dual equivalence graphs and a combinatorial proof of LLT and Macdonald positivity (2010, methodology): “on of Kostka-Macdonald coefficients as the graded multiplicity of an irreducible representation in the Garsia-Haiman module, and hence Ke λ,µ(q,t) ∈N[q,t]. Following an idea outlined by Procesi, Haiman [Hai01] proved this conjecture by analyzing the algebraic geometry of the isospectral Hilbert scheme”
- A k-tableau characterization of k-Schur functions (2005, background): “involved the study of Macdonald polynomials. The Schur basis is again fundamental in this setting since the Macdonald expansion coefficients in this basis have a representation theoretic interpretation [6, 7, 11]. In work with Lascoux on the Macdonald polynomials [15], we discovered a new family of sy”
- Vanishing theorems and character formulas for the Hilbert scheme of points in the plane (2001, methodology): “The canonical projection X → V induces a morphism X/G → V/G whose composite with the isomorphism V //G ∼= X/G yields the Chow morphism.”
- A combinatorial formula for non-symmetric Macdonald polynomials (2006, methodology): “a for Macdonald’s symmetric functions (for root systems of type A). In fact, we gave two formulas, one for the transformed Macdonald polynomials H˜ µ(x;q,t), which appear in the positivity theorem of [8] and are connected tothe geometry ofHilbert schemes, and another [6, Proposition 8.1]forthe integ”
- Representations of Rational Cherednik algebras with minimal support and torus knots (2013, methodology): “ e n−2jHen−2j for j≥0. Theorem 7.1 is proved in the next three subsections. 7.2. Procesi bundle. In the proof we use a remarkable bundle on X, the Procesi bundle Poriginally constructed by M. Haiman, [Hai]; an alternative construction was produced by Ginzburg, [Gi2]. The Hamiltonian reduction constr”
- Symplectic reflection algebras (2007, background): “[17, Theorem 1.1], produces such as equivalence, but it is rather implicit and we require something more explicit: for Γ = {1}this is essentially a combination of the celebrated n! theorem of Haiman, [89], and the celebrated derived McKay correspondence of Bridgeland–King–Reid, [21]; the case of gen”
- Torus knots and the rational DAHA (2012, background): “02a]). The following isomorphisms hold: 26 E. GORSKY, A. OBLOMKOV, J. RASMUSSEN, AND V. SHENDE (1) Hi(Z n,P⊗Tk) = 0 for all k,nand i>0. (2) DHn = H0(Zn,P⊗T). (3) (DHn)ε = H0(Zn,ΛnT). Theorem 6.14 ([Hai01]). Let Iµ denote the monomial ideal in C[x,y]correspondingto a Young diagram µ. Let Jµ denote”
- A note on automorphisms and birational transformations of holomorphic symplectic manifolds (2009, background): “Let Zn be the isospectral Hilbert scheme, which is defined by Haiman [16] as the reduced fiber product of S with S over S and Z̃n → Zn a resolution of singularities.”
- Almost-commuting variety, D-modules, and Cherednik algebras (2004, background): “In an earlier paper, Haiman showed, cf. [Ha1, Proposition 2.13], that the above theorem holds for all k ≫ 0. The corresponding statement for all k follows from Haiman’s proof of his his Polygraph theorem, the main technical result in [ Ha2 ].”