Qudit quantum-state tomography

By R. Thew, Kae Nemoto, A. White, William J. Munro. 2002

260 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7158c171b44aec7a875936256a935ba7fce1b130

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Center for Bits
2. Isaac L. Chuang Kavli Institute of NanoScience
3. A. O. Physics
4. Lieven M. K. Vandersypen
5. Paul G. Kwiat
6. M. I. O. Technology
7. Delft University of Technology

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

1. Center for Bits
2. Isaac L. Chuang Kavli Institute of NanoScience
3. A. O. Physics
4. Lieven M. K. Vandersypen
5. Evan Jeffrey
6. Joseph Altepeter
7. Paul G. Kwiat
8. M. I. O. Technology

Citations in the corpus

• Photonic State Tomography (2005, background): “Multiple-qudit systems can be reconstructed by using separable projectors (Thew et al., 2002) upon which the multiple qudit Stokes parameters are dependent (these dependencies were laid out in Section 1.3.2).”
• NMR techniques for quantum control and computation (2004, methodology): “Recently, it has become a common tool used to evaluate NMR states (11; 108), states of optical photon qubits (112), and even vibrational states of molecules (113).”