Optimal kernel choice for large-scale two-sample tests
By Arthur Gretton, Bharath K. Sriperumbudur, Dino Sejdinovic, Heiko Strathmann, Sivaraman Balakrishnan, Massimiliano Pontil, Kenji Fukumizu. 2012
764 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Evaluation & Benchmarks
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Evaluation & Benchmarks
- Arthur Gretton
- David Lopez-Paz
- Bernhard Schölkopf
- Jianmin Wang
- Mingsheng Long
- Matthew B. Blaschko
- Bharath K. Sriperumbudur
- Zhangjie Cao
Citations in the corpus
- Generative Moment Matching Networks (2015, methodology): “In the literature there have been several alternative estimators designed to overcome this (Gretton et al., 2012a).”
- Kernel Mean Embedding of Distributions: A Review and Beyonds (2016, methodology): “Theorem 3.5 below describes an unbiased quadratic-time estimate of the MMD, and its asymptotic distribution under an alternative hypothesis that P 6= Q. Theorem 3.6 (Gretton et al. 2012a; Lemma 6; Corollary 16).”
- Kernel‐based tests for joint independence (2016, background): “ i<j o = 2σ2. This heuristic performs quite well in many practical applications. It may be possible, however, to extend alternative approaches from two-sample testing to independence testing (e.g. Gretton et al., 2012). For discrete data, we choose a trivial kernel defined by k(x,y) := 1{x=y}. In ”
- Interpretable Distribution Features with Maximum Testing Power (2016, methodology): “…on RKHS distances (Eric et al., 2008; Fromont et al., 2012; Gretton et al., 2012a) or energy distances (Székely and Rizzo, 2004; Baringhaus and Franz, 2004) have as their test statistic an integral probability metric, the Maximum Mean Discrepancy (Gretton et al., 2012a; Sejdinovic et al., 2013).”
- Bayesian Learning of Kernel Embeddings (2016, methodology): “As noted in Gretton et al. (2012b), the choice of the kernel k is critically important for the power of the tests presented in Section 2.2.”
- A Test of Relative Similarity For Model Selection in Generative Models (2015, methodology): “(Gretton et al., 2012a Let V := ( v 1 , ..., v m ) be m i.i.d. random variables, where v := ( x, y ) ∼ P x × P y .”
- Adaptivity and Computation-Statistics Tradeoffs for Kernel and Distance based High Dimensional Two Sample Testing (2015, background): “Gretton et al. [2012b] also make suggestions for choosing the bandwidth parameter, but only for the linear-time gMMD 2 l (see Section 6), and also with guarantees only in the fixed d setting.”
- Fast Two-Sample Testing with Analytic Representations of Probability Measures (2015, background): “The probability that all T i sit in the complement of interval ) and such an event implies that S 2 ϕ,J = 0 .”
- A low variance consistent test of relative dependency (2014, background): “This kernel is sufficient to obtain good performance, although others choices exist (Gretton et al., 2012).”
- On the Decreasing Power of Kernel and Distance Based Nonparametric Hypothesis Tests in High Dimensions (2014, methodology): “5A of (Gretton et al. 2012a), the authors choose the latter (verified by personal communication) and find that the power is only very slowly affected by dimension.”
- FastMMD: Ensemble of Circular Discrepancy for Efficient Two-Sample Test (2014, methodology): “The maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) is the latest test statistic designed for this task by measuring the discrepancy of two distributions by embedding them in a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (Gretton et al., 2012a).”
- MMD GAN: Towards Deeper Understanding of Moment Matching Network (2017, background): “Note that [18] considers the linear combination of characteristic kernels, which can also be incorporated into the discussed composition kernels.”
- Revisiting Classifier Two-Sample Tests (2016, methodology): “First, two-sample tests can measure statistical dependence (Gretton et al., 2012a).”
- A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learning (2019, background): “[62] adopt the linear-time unbiased estimation of MK-MMD to avoid numerous inner product operations.”
- A Survey on Deep Transfer Learning (2018, methodology): “The MMD distance used in this work is defined as and the loss function is defined as [12] improved previous work by replace MMD distance with multiple kernel variant MMD (MK-MMD) distance proposed by [8].”
- Deep Hashing Network for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (2017, methodology): “) is the multi-kernel maximum mean discrepancy between the source and target representations, [24].”