Inequality and Specialization: The Growth of Low-Skill Service Jobs in the United States

By David H. Autor, David Dorn. Social Science Research Network, 2009

148 citations recorded by the source corpus.

After a decade in which wages and employment fell precipitously in low-skill occupations and expanded in high-skill occupations, the shape of U.S. earnings and job growth sharply polarized in the 1990s. Employment shares and relative earnings rose in both low and high-skill jobs, leading to a distinct U-shaped relationship between skill levels and employment and wage growth. This paper analyzes the sources of the changing shape of the lower-tail of the U.S. wage and employment distributions. A first contribution is to document a hitherto unknown fact: the twisting of the lower tail is substantially accounted for by a single proximate cause − rising employment and wages in low-education, in-person service occupations. We study the determinants of this rise at the level of local labor markets over the period of 1950 through 2005. Our approach is rooted in a model of changing task specialization in which "routine" clerical and production tasks are displaced by automation. We find that in labor markets that were initially specialized in routine-intensive occupations, employment and wages polarized after 1980, with growing employment and earnings in both high-skill occupations and low-skill service jobs.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/71501a79a9e892ac7a9b572de42dbe0c318678c5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. John Van Reenen
  2. Thomas DeLeire
  3. Dirk Antonczyk
  4. Bernd Fitzenberger
  5. Alexandra Spitz-Oener
  6. Christopher L. Smith
  7. Ute Leuschner
  8. Sandra E. Black

In General Health Professions

  1. Thomas DeLeire
  2. Dirk Antonczyk
  3. Bernd Fitzenberger
  4. Alexandra Spitz-Oener
  5. Christopher L. Smith
  6. Ute Leuschner
  7. Sandra E. Black
  8. John Van Reenen

Citations in the corpus