Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus
By Peter A. Banks, T. Bollen, C. Dervenis, H. Gooszen, Colin D. Johnson, Michel G. Sarr, G. Tsiotos, S. Vege. Gut, 2012
6,497 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Epidemiology, Infectious Diseases, Surgery
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/713a9ed1dcca7ba7c9e2afa752240f1e13548445
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- J. Dumonceau
- C. Kapral
- J. Wilding
- L. Aabakken
- I. Papanikolaou
- A. Tringali
- G. Vanbiervliet
- F. Greenway
Citations in the corpus
- A Randomized, Controlled Trial of 3.0 mg of Liraglutide in Weight Management. (2015, methodology): “† “Pancreatitis acute” was reported as serious by the investigator but was classified as mild according to revised Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis.(19) Table 3.”
- ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline (2019, methodology): “This system is useful for research and comparison purposes but for some AEs, more specific classification systems are available: ▪ Pancreatitis: the revised Atlanta classification of severity [10] is a better predictor for PEP-related mortality than a system based on hospital duration as shown in a ”
- American Gastroenterological Association Institute Guideline on Initial Management of Acute Pancreatitis. (2018, background): “Moderately severe pancreatitis is characterized by transient local or systemic complications or transient organ failure (<48 hours), and severe AP is associated with persistent organ failure.(9) Necrotizing pancreatitis is characterized by the presence of pancreatic and/or peripancreatic necrosis, a”