Evaluating correlations in studies of personality and behavior: Beyond the number of significant findings to be expected by chance

By R. Sherman, D. Funder. 2009

86 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7126ba9ac3f81e07e9624b8fecba934f1efd3221

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. R. Sherman
2. D. Funder
3. C. Nave
4. B. Roberts
5. J. de Houwer
6. Jaap J. A. Denissen
7. Manfred J. Schmitt
8. Marco Perugini

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Jaap J. A. Denissen
2. Jens B. Asendorpf
3. D. Funder
4. C. Nave
5. R. Sherman
6. Brian A. Nosek
7. Filip De Fruyt
8. B. Roberts

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. J. de Houwer
2. Jaap J. A. Denissen
3. Manfred J. Schmitt
4. C. Nave
5. Marco Perugini
6. D. Funder
7. R. Sherman
8. Jens B. Asendorpf

Citations in the corpus

• Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology † (2013, background): “At an overall level, random permutation tests (Sherman & Funder, 2009) provide a means to determine whether a set of correlations is unlikely to be due to chance.”
• Situational construal is related to personality and gender (2013, methodology): “Following the procedure outlined by Sherman and Funder (2009), a randomization test on each of these four matrixes determined the probability of the observed number of statistically significant correlates and the average absolute r of each matrix.”