Volume filling factors of the ISM phases in star forming galaxies. I. The role of the disk-halo interaction

By M. A. D. A. D. Breitschwerdt. 2004

148 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The role of matter circulation between the disk and halo in establishing the volume filling factors of the different ISM phases in the Galactic disk (|z |≤ 250 pc) is investigated, using a modified version of the three-dimensional supernova- driven ISM model of Avillez (2000). We carried out adaptive mesh refinement simulations of the ISM with five supernova rates (in units of the Galactic value), σ/σGal = 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16 (corresponding to starburst conditions) using three finer level resolutions of 2.5, 1.25 and 0.625 pc, allowing us to understand how resolution would affect the volumes of gas phases in pressure equilibrium. We find that the volume filling factors of the different ISM phases depend sensitively on the existence of a duty cycle between the disk and halo acting as a pressure release valve for the hot (T > 10 5.5 K) phase in the disk. The amount of cold gas (defined as the gas with T < 10 3 K) picked up in the simulations varies from a value of 19% for σ/σGal = 1 to ∼5% for σ/σGal = 4a nd≤1% for higher SN rates. Background heating prevents the cold gas from immediate collapse and thus ensures the stability of the cold gas phase. The mean occupation fraction of the hot phase varies from about 17% for the Galactic SN rate to ∼28%, for σ/σGal = 4, and to 44% for σ/σGal = 16. Overall the filling factor of the hot gas does not increase much as we move towards higher SN rates, following a power law offv, hot �∝ (σ/σGal) 0.363 . Such a modest dependence on the SN rate is a consequence of the evacuation of the hot phase into the halo through the duty cycle. This leads to volume filling factors of the hot phase considerably smaller than those predicted in the three-phase model of McKee & Ostriker (1977) even in the absence of magnetic fields.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/71104baf3545e1db5151e305f5ee40f68648a15d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. T. Naab
  3. Ralf Klessen
  4. A. Dekel
  5. L. Hernquist
  6. Jeremiah P. Ostriker
  7. Volker Springel
  8. Mark R. Krumholz

In Instrumentation

  1. A. Dekel
  2. P. Hopkins
  3. T. Naab
  4. L. Hernquist
  5. Jeremiah P. Ostriker
  6. R. Somerville
  7. Andrey V. Kravtsov
  8. Volker Springel

Citations in the corpus