Impact of User Pairing on 5G Nonorthogonal Multiple-Access Downlink Transmissions
By Zhiguo Ding, P. Fan, H. Vincent Poor. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2016
1,432 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/710f48e132ec81db95ff292183d607f50d558a79
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Yuanwei Liu
- Robert Schober
- Zhiguo Ding
- Rui Zhang
- Naofal Al-Dhahir
- H. Vincent Poor
- Lajos Hanzo
- Xidong Mu
Citations in the corpus
- A Survey of Rate-Optimal Power Domain NOMA With Enabling Technologies of Future Wireless Networks (2019, methodology): “[59] has proposed a novel PA scheme in downlink NOMA called cog-”
- A Survey on Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access for 5G Networks: Research Challenges and Future Trends (2017, methodology): “The scheme proposed in [13] is an example for CR-NOMA, where a BS serves two downlink users by using the NOMA principle.”
- Dynamic User Clustering and Power Allocation for Uplink and Downlink Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA) Systems (2016, methodology): “The impact of user pairing was studied in [7] for a two-user NOMA system.”
- Cooperative Non-orthogonal Multiple Access With Simultaneous Wireless Information and Power Transfer (2015, methodology): “Motivation and Contributions One important advantage of the NOMA concept is that it can squeeze a user with better channel conditions into a channel that is occupied by a user with worse channel conditions [2].”
- Energy-Efficient Resource Allocation for Downlink Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access Network (2016, background): “The impact of users’ channel conditions on the performance gain of NOMA over OFDMA was studied in [31].”
- On Optimal Power Allocation for Downlink Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access Systems (2017, background): “Thus, in practice, each channel is often restricted to be assigned to two users [21], [28], [29], which is also beneficial to reduce the error propagation of SIC.”
- Power-Domain Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA) in 5G Systems: Potentials and Challenges (2016, background): “The impact of user pairing/grouping was investigated mathematically in [41].”
- Performance Evaluation of Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access in Visible Light Communication (2016, background): “The problem of user pairing on the performance NOMA in RF systems has recently been studied in [16].”
- Optimal Joint Power and Subcarrier Allocation for Full-Duplex Multicarrier Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access Systems (2016, background): “that [8]–[11] focus only on the application of NOMA in single-carrier systems.”
- Enhancing the Physical Layer Security of Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access in Large-Scale Networks (2016, background): “create more distinct channel quality differences between the paired users, since existing NOMA studies have demonstrated that it is beneficial to pair two users having rather different channel conditions [5], [11], [39].”
- Exploiting Full/Half-Duplex User Relaying in NOMA Systems (2018, background): “In [13], the cognitive radio inspired NOMA concept was proposed, in which the influence of user pairing with the fixed power allocation in NOMA systems was discussed.”
- Exploiting Intelligent Reflecting Surfaces in NOMA Networks: Joint Beamforming Optimization (2019, background): “Ding et al. [14] further analyzed the performance of NOMA in both a fixed power allocation system (F-NOMA) and cognitive radio inspired NOMA (CR-NOMA) under different user pairing schemes.”
- Physical-Layer Security of 5G Wireless Networks for IoT: Challenges and Opportunities (2019, background): “ing two users (near user and far user) to a single orthogonal resource block [57], is developed to trade off the complexity and efficiency.”
- Modulation and Multiple Access for 5G Networks (2017, methodology): “Therefore, a cognitive-radio-inspired NOMA (CRNOMA) scheme has been proposed in [97], which is different from the traditional scheme with fixed power allocation.”