Decomposition Techniques for Bilinear Saddle Point Problems and Variational Inequalities with Affine Monotone Operators

By Bruce A. Cox, Anatoli B. Juditsky, Arkadi Nemirovski. 2015

32 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The majority of first-order methods for large-scale convex–concave saddle point problems and variational inequalities with monotone operators are proximal algorithms. To make such an algorithm practical, the problem’s domain should be proximal-friendly—admit a strongly convex function with easy to minimize linear perturbations. As a by-product, this domain admits a computationally cheap linear minimization oracle (LMO) capable to minimize linear forms. There are, however, important situations where a cheap LMO indeed is available, but the problem domain is not proximal-friendly, which motivates search for algorithms based solely on LMO. For smooth convex minimization, there exists a classical algorithm using LMO—conditional gradient. In contrast, known to us similar techniques for other problems with convex structure (nonsmooth convex minimization, convex–concave saddle point problems, even as simple as bilinear ones, and variational inequalities with monotone operators, even as simple as affine) are quite recent and utilize common approach based on Fenchel-type representations of the associated objectives/vector fields. The goal of this paper was to develop alternative (and seemingly much simpler) decomposition techniques based on LMO for bilinear saddle point problems and for variational inequalities with affine monotone operators.

Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Numerical Analysis, Optimization & Training

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Mechanics

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

In Numerical Analysis

In Optimization & Training

Citations in the corpus

Frank-Wolfe Algorithms for Saddle Point Problems (2016, methodology): “More recently, Juditsky and Nemirovski (2016) (see also Cox et al. (2015)) proposed a method to transform a VIP on Z where one has only access to a LMO, to a “dual” VIP on which they can use a projection-type method.”