Using the Gravity Equation to Differentiate Among Alternative Theories of Trade" Canadian Journal of

By Robert C. Feenstra, James R. Markusen, Andrew K. Rose. 2001

608 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/70ea4d9cf2056aeb50c11c40092fbc7de8c260c3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Trade Booms, Trade Busts, and Trade Costs (2011, unknown): “In a similar vein, Robert C. Feenstra, James R. Markusen, and Andrew K. Rose (2001) and Simon J. Evenett and Wolfgang Keller (2002) also show that earlier gravity equations are consistent with various competing trade models.”
The Gravity Equation in International Trade (2009, unknown): “This is what Feenstra et al (2001) do.”
The empirics of new economic geography (2010, unknown): “Other empirical studies finding evidence of home market effects using international trade data include Feenstra, Markusen, and Rose (2001), Head and Ries (2001), and Hanson and Xiang (2004).”
Exploring the Intensive and Extensive Margins of World Trade (2004, unknown): “Note, however, that the decomposition (16) is valid only for levels, and multiplying the conditional partial derivative and the probability of observing a positive trade volume does not deliver the unconditional partial derivative.”
Gravity Equations: Workhorse,Toolkit, and Cookbook (2013, methodology): “Glick and Taylor (2010) is an example where MTI is used to estimate the costs of military conflicts. Anderson and Yotov (2010a) apply this method to assess the impact of an agreement on trade between Canadian provinces that took place in 1995.”
Exchange Rate Volatility and Exports: New Empirical Evidence from the Emerging East Asian Economies (2010, unknown): “This finding is consistent with the theoretical prediction and empirical findings of Feenstra et al. (2001) which demonstrate that a country’s exports of homogeneous and internationally-differentiated products are more sensitive to the importing country’s income than to its own income.”
Trade Costs and the Home Market Effect (2008, unknown): “Such papers include Weder (1995), Lundb¨ack and Torstensson (1999), Feenstra, Markusen and Rose (2001), Trionfetti (2001), Weder (2003), Yu (2005), and Br¨ulhart and Trionfetti (2005).”
Environmental regulation and the export dynamics of energy technologies (2008, unknown): “…to the size of the exporter’s economy (GDPi) are higher than those related to the importers (GDPj), and this is consistent with theoretical results reported by Feenstra et al. (2001) for the case of “differentiated goods”, where the domestic-income elasticity exceeds the partner-income elasticity.”
The Log of Gravity (2006, unknown): “Trade data for larger countries (as gauged by GDP per capita) tend to be of higher quality (see Frankel & Wei, 1993; Frankel, 1997); hence, models assuming that V[yi x] is a function of higher powers of E[yi x] might give excessive weight to the observations that 11 A nonparametric generalized least”
The Empirics of Agglomeration and Trade (2003, unknown): “(2002), and Feenstra et al. (2001) suggest that NEG models could also rely on Cournot competition with free entry.”
Using the gravity equation to differentiate among alternative theories of trade: another look (2007, methodology): “Notwithstanding the fact that the gravity model of Feenstra et al. (2001), estimated in this article, and the traditional gravity model of Santos Silva and Tenreyro (2006) are not completely identical, they still share a significant part of economic variables in common.”
TERRORISM AND INTERNATIONAL TOURISM: NEW EVIDENCE (2008, background): “See, for instance, the papers by Rose (2000, 2004), Feenstra et al. (2001), Anderson and Van Wincoop (2003) or Helpman et al. (2007) for trade, Demekas et al.”