Identifying suspicious URLs: an application of large-scale online learning
By Justin Ma, Lawrence K. Saul, Stefan Savage, Geoffrey M. Voelker. 2009
609 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, Safety, Robustness & Interpretability, Signal Processing
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
- H. Brendan McMahan
- Francis R. Bach
- Tomás Pevný
- Olivier Fercoq
- Steven C. H. Hoi
- Doyen Sahoo
- Simon Lacoste-Julien
- Andrew H. Sung
In Information Systems
- Steven C. H. Hoi
- Doyen Sahoo
- Tomás Pevný
- Olivier Fercoq
- Brad Wardman
- Gary Warner
- Chenghao Liu
- Andrew H. Sung
In Safety, Robustness & Interpretability
- Wojciech Samek
- Grgoire Montavon
- Klaus‐Robert Müller
- K. Müller
- Tomás Pevný
- Olivier Fercoq
- Simon Lacoste-Julien
- Fabian Pedregosa
In Signal Processing
- Francis R. Bach
- Steven C. H. Hoi
- Doyen Sahoo
- Simon Lacoste-Julien
- Michael I. Jordan
- Tomás Pevný
- Olivier Fercoq
- Alexandre D'efossez
Citations in the corpus
- Improved asynchronous parallel optimization analysis for stochastic incremental methods (2018, methodology): “This data set contains more than 2 million URLs obtained at random from Yahoo’s directory listing (for the “benign” URLs) and from a large Web mail provider (for the “malicious” URLs).”
- Learning privately from multiparty data (2016, background): “The Malicious URL Dataset (Ma et al., 2009) is a collection of examples of malicious URLs from a large Web mail provider.”
- Perturbed Iterate Analysis for Asynchronous Stochastic Optimization (2015, neutral): “Logistic regression Synthetic 3M 10K 20 rcv1 [31] from [32] ≈ 700K ≈ 42K ≈ 73 url [33] from [32] ≈ 3.”
- ASAGA: Asynchronous Parallel SAGA (2016, methodology): “(2011) and re-used in all the later papers that we mentioned in the related work section, with the notable exceptions of Mania et al. (2015) and Duchi et al.”
- Beyond blacklists: learning to detect malicious web sites from suspicious URLs (2009, methodology): “We address the issue in subsequent work by using online learning algorithms [14].”
- Fully Distributed Privacy Preserving Mini-batch Gradient Descent Learning (2015, background): “provide a nice summary of online learning for large scale data [15].”
- Cyclades: Conflict-free Asynchronous Machine Learning (2016, methodology): “Specifically, we run classification for the URL dataset [15] contains ⇠ 2.”
- PhishZoo: Detecting Phishing Websites by Looking at Them (2011, background): “Host features of the URL include properties of IP address, the owner of the site, DNS properties such as TTL, and geographical location [10].”
- Malicious URL Detection using Machine Learning: A Survey (2017, background): “For the 2 million URLs, [28] obtained over a million host-based features.”
- Loda: Lightweight on-line detector of anomalies (2016, methodology): “Finally, Loda's capability to efficiently process big datasets is demonstrated on the WEB UCI dataset (Ma et al. 2009) with 2.4 million samples and 3.2 million features.”
- Learning to Detect Phishing Webpages (2014, methodology): “have been shown to perform better compared to some batch algorithms when trained continuously with variable-feature sets in the context of detecting malicious URLs [31].”
- AUC Maximization in the Era of Big Data and AI: A Survey (2022, background): “Such datasets are abundant in online spam filtering [145], ad click prediction [112], and identifying malicious URLs [108].”
- Proactive Discovery of Phishing Related Domain Names (2012, methodology): “…on the fly, domains as malicious or benign is widely used, with either batch methods such as SVM, Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression(like in [2–4]), or on-line classifi-cation algorithms such as Confidence Weighted (CW), Adaptive Regularization of Weight (AROW), Passive-Aggressive (PA) (see [5, 9, 15]).”