Re-architecting datacenter networks and stacks for low latency and high performance
By Mark James Handley, Costin Raiciu, Alexandru Agache, A. Voinescu, Andrew William Moore, Gianni Antichi, M. Wójcik. Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication, 2017
447 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/70c5d22a32ce03885dc9bc81bfa1f0fbc4c9f097
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
- Mohammad Alizadeh
- Behnam Montazeri
- David Wetherall
- John K. Ousterhout
- Frank P. Kelly
- Amin Vahdat
- Rui Miao
- Yuliang Li
In Information Systems
Citations in the corpus
- A link layer protocol for quantum networks (2019, background): “for SDN [16], data center networks [43], content delivery networks [22] or cloud”
- Swift: Delay is Simple and Effective for Congestion Control in the Datacenter (2020, methodology): “When number of flows exceed network BDP, Credit-based: pHost [21], NDP [23], Homa [39] and Express-Pass [15], rely on the receiver end-host issuing credit packets.”
- Homa: a receiver-driven low-latency transport protocol using network priorities (2018, methodology): “The state-of-the-art approach, NDP [15], strictly limits queues to 8 packets, equivalent to roughly 10 μs of latency at 10 Gbps.”
- HPCC: high precision congestion control (2019, background): “…[42] needs a new switch architecture for lossless fabric and performs per-packet adaptive load balancing of packet routes in switches; HOMA [33] and NDP [22] are receiver-driven, credit-based solutions, which is a big shift from the state-of-the-art in practice, since they have complex receivers.”