Life history costs of olfactory status signalling in mice
By L. Gosling, Susan C. Roberts, E. A. Thornton, M. Andrew. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2000
101 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/70c232370a2739d16b7b040b592e4c026551f485
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Scent-marking displays provide honest signals of health and infection (2004, background): “Our results are consistent with evidence that scent marking is costly (Gosling et al., 2000), and they suggest that mice modulate their marking to minimize their costs (because otherwise males should always mark at high frequency).”
- Giant panda scent-marking strategies in the wild: role of season, sex and marking surface (2012, background): “Spotted hyaenas, Crocuta crocuta, may deposit 40% of their body weight annually in lipid-rich scent marks (Gorman 1990) and in laboratory mice, Mus musculus, competitive scent marking can reduce growth rate and body size (Gosling et al. 2000).”