CIF applications. XV. enCIFer: a program for viewing, editing and visualizing CIFs

By F. Allen, Owen Johnson, Gregory P. Shields, Barry F. Smith, Matthew Towler. 2004

748 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Molecular Biology, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/70bb552133abbe724d7430f49c9b4b793809b2f9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

1. Suzanna C. Ward
2. Colin R. Groom
3. Ian J. Bruno
4. M. Lightfoot
5. G. Taylor
6. G. Winter
7. Robert M. Hanson
8. P. Müller

In Molecular Biology

1. Suzanna C. Ward
2. Colin R. Groom
3. Ian J. Bruno
4. G. Sheldrick
5. M. Lightfoot
6. G. Winter
7. G. Taylor
8. Robert M. Hanson

In Physical and Theoretical Chemistry

1. Suzanna C. Ward
2. Peter A. Wood
3. Michael Platings
4. Colin R. Groom
5. Clare F. Macrae
6. Peter T. A. Galek
7. J. Stevens
8. Ian J. Bruno

Citations in the corpus

• Mercury 4.0: from visualization to analysis, design and prediction (2020, methodology): “There is also a special CSD Teaching Subset (https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/Community/educationalresources/ teaching-database/), as well as software for checking CIF syntax (Allen et al., 2004) and unit-cell dimensions (CellCellCheckCSD; https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/Community/CSDCommunity/CellCheckCSD/).”
• The Cambridge Structural Database (2016, methodology): “During deposition, the CIF syntax is automatically checked based on the checks in enCIFer (Allen et al., 2004) and the depositor is required to fix any issues before continuing with the deposition process.”
• A short history of SHELX. (2008, background): “These days such padding is less desirable and there are excellent programs such as enCIFer (Allen et al., 2004) for working with CIF files, so CIFTAB is now effectively redundant.”