Respiration in the light measured by 12CO 2 emission in 13CO 2 atmosphere in maize leaves

By Francesco Loreto, V. Velikova, G. Marco. 2001

83 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The mitochondrial respiration during photosynthesis is difficult to measure and is indirectly estimated mainly in C 3 plants. Loreto et al. [(1999) Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 26, 733–736] have shown that the emission of 12 CO 2 from illuminated leaves exposed to air containing 13 CO 2 measures photorespiration and mitochondrial respiration in C 3 leaves. This method was used to measure the mitochondrial respiration in illuminated maize leaves. The 12 CO 2 emission was steady after 30 s, a time sufficient to label the CO 2 leakage from bundle sheath cells with 13 CO 2 , but not the mitochondrial respiration in the light. The emission was low (0.1–0.4 ppm or 0.2–0.4 µmol m –2 s –1 ) in a wide range of leaf temperatures and light intensities, but increased at light intensities below 200 µmol m –2 s –1 and at temperatures above 42°C. At 120 s after labelling, the leaf was darkened and the emission rapidly matched the mitochondrial respiration measured by gas exchange. The emission of 12 CO 2 in the light was inversely correlated with photosynthesis. This suggested that most of the respiratory CO 2 was refixed by photosynthesis. The amount of refixed intercellular 12 CO 2 was calculated from gas-exchange parameters. It was 60 to 90% of the tota l12 CO 2 in leaves illuminated and exposed to temperatures below 42°C. In leaves with reduced photosynthesis because of exposure to higher temperatures or low light, the 12 CO 2 refixation decreased. The sum of refixed and emitted 12 CO 2 was close to the mitochondrial respiration in the dark. This suggested that in these leaves the mitochondrial respiration was not inhibited in the light. In salt- and water-stressed leaves, however, the sum of refixed and emitted 12 CO 2 was lower than mitochondrial respiration in the dark, suggesting that the mitochondrial respiration may be inhibited in the light.

Subfields: Molecular Biology, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/70b1821d4bb2c2dcee852a7d3ed4d5d209ea34ec

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Molecular Biology

  1. H. Griffiths
  2. M. Turnbull
  3. K. Griffin
  4. O. Atkin
  5. D. Lawlor
  6. M. M. Chaves
  7. Jaume Flexas

In Plant Science

  1. H. Griffiths
  2. K. Griffin
  3. M. Turnbull
  4. G. Cornic
  5. O. Atkin
  6. D. Lawlor
  7. M. M. Chaves
  8. Jaume Flexas

Citations in the corpus