Approximate dynamic programming: solving the curses of dimensionality
By P. Pardalos. 2009
1,779 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Reinforcement Learning, Mathematical Optimization
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Ian Osband
- Benjamin Van Roy
- Brendan O'Donoghue
- Csaba Szepesvari
- R´emi Munos
- Marc G. Bellemare
- Zheng Wen
- Hado van Hasselt
In Reinforcement Learning
- Sergey Levine
- R´emi Munos
- Ian Osband
- Marc G. Bellemare
- Pieter Abbeel
- Hado van Hasselt
- Csaba Szepesvari
- Shimon Whiteson
In Mathematical Optimization
- Huizhen Yu
- Brendan O'Donoghue
- Csaba Szepesvari
- Frank L. Lewis
- Huan Xu
- Kyriakos G. Vamvoudakis
- Hado van Hasselt
- Marc G. Bellemare
Citations in the corpus
- Safe Model-based Reinforcement Learning with Stability Guarantees (2017, methodology): “In our experiments, we use approximate dynamic programming [36] to capture the performance of the policy.”
- Variational Bayesian Reinforcement Learning with Regret Bounds (2018, methodology): “This is a dimensionality reduction and generalization strategy that, in the no uncertainty case, has theoretical guarantees [25, 82], and has been used successfully in continuous control [109, 110, 66, 67, 60].”
- Generalization and Exploration via Randomized Value Functions (2014, methodology): “Algorithm 1 Least-Squares Value Iteration Input: Φ0, . . . ,ΦH−1 ∈ |S||A|×K , λ ∈ ++, {(xih, aih, rih) : i j, h = 0, . . . ,H − 1} Output: θj0, . . . , θj,H−1 1: θjH ← 0, ΦH ← 0 2: for h = H − 1, . . . , 1, 0 do 3: Generate regression matrix and vector A← Φh(x0h, a0h)... Φh(xj−1,h, aj−1,h) b←…”
- Compress and Control (2014, background): “(Howard 1960), approximate dynamic programming (Bertsekas and Tsitsiklis 1996; Powell 2011) and actor-critic methods (Sutton and Barto 1998), for example, all crucially depend on how well policy evaluation can be performed.”
- The endogenous grid method for discrete‐continuous dynamic choice models with (or without) taste shocks (2017, background): “9Referred to as the post-decision state in the operations research literature, Powell (2007). all discrete labor market choices dt can be calculated directly using the inverted Euler equation ct(A⃗t|dt) = (u′)−1 ( βrhs ( Mt+1(A⃗t) )) , (17) where rhs ( Mt+1(A⃗t) ) is the right hand side of (15)…”
- A Function Approximation Method for Model-based High-Dimensional Inverse Reinforcement Learning (2017, neutral): “A good introduction is given in [6].”
- A modern Bayesian look at the multi-armed bandit (2010, methodology): “Powell [12] notes that ‘Unfortunately, at the time of this writing, there do not exist easy to use software utilities for computing standard Gittins indices’.”
- Finding multiple optimal solutions to optimal load distribution problem in hydropower plant (2012, neutral): “We can also try approximate dynamic programming [38] to approximate fi(si).”
- AI, OR and Control Theory: A Rosetta Stone for Stochastic Optimization (2012, background): “In Powell (2011), I argue that a good definition for a state variable is Definition 3.1 A state variable is the minimally dimensioned function of history that is necessary and sufficient to compute the decision function, the transition function, and the contribution function.”
- Approximate Dynamic Programming for Ambulance Redeployment (2010, methodology): “A generic approach for ADP involves using value function approximations of the form P p=1 r p φ p (·), where {r p : p = 1, . . . , P } are tunable parameters and {φ p (·) : p = 1, . . . , P } are fixed basis functions; see Bertsekas and Tsitsiklis (1996) and Powell (2007).”
- Neural Adaptive Video Streaming with Pensieve (2017, methodology): “, Post-Decision States [6, 34]) could be used to accelerate learning in Pensieve as well.”
- A review of dynamic vehicle routing problems (2013, methodology): “Powell et al. [113] formulated a truckload PDP as a Markov Decision Process (MDP).”
- Pathologies of temporal difference methods in approximate dynamic programming (2010, methodology): “Note that even in this more general case, the policy evaluation Eq. (6) can be solved by using simulation and low order calculations (see [ Ber10a ] and the survey [Ber10b], which contains many references).”
- On the Relationship Between Feature Selection and Classification Accuracy (2008, background): “In the literature, this phenomenon is referred to as the curse of dimensionality (Powell, 2007).”
- An Intelligent Battery Controller Using Bias-Corrected Q-learning (2012, neutral): “The effect of this particular bias in applications has been observed earlier in estimating asset values in finance (Brown 1974), and by authors in reinforcement learning (Thurn and Schwartz 1993; Ormoneit and Sen 2002), management science (Smith and Winkler 2006) and in operations research (Powell 2”
- Reinforcement Learning for Partially Observable Dynamic Processes: Adaptive Dynamic Programming Using Measured Output Data (2011, methodology): “RL methods have been developed starting from learning mechanisms observed in mammals [4], [7]–[9], [24], [28], [29], [33].”
- Multistage Stochastic Programming: A Scenario Tree Based Approach to Planning under Uncertainty (2011, background): “to be taken into account — seems to be growing in the machine learning community, as indicated by a series of advances in approximate dynamic programming motivated by such applications (Powell, 2007; Csáji & Monostori, 2008).”
- Approximate policy iteration: a survey and some new methods (2011, methodology): “We refer to the literature, and particularly the books [5, 7, 9] for an explanation of these terms and further discussion.”