Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design.

By P. Camic, J. Rhodes, Lucy Yardley. 2003

735 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Education, General Health Professions

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/70799696c7a25550004bc30a200cd6474132eddb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. I. Grieger
2. Henrik Gustafsson
3. P. Hassmén
4. J. Ponterotto
5. R. Edwards
6. Susie Weller
7. Fredrick J. Wertz
8. Jasmine A. Mena

In Education

1. I. Grieger
2. Erik Lundkvist
3. Henrik Gustafsson
4. R. Edwards
5. Susie Weller
6. Fredrick J. Wertz
7. P. Hassmén
8. J. Ponterotto

In General Health Professions

1. Henrik Gustafsson
2. P. Hassmén
3. Erik Lundkvist
4. R. Edwards
5. Susie Weller
6. Fredrick J. Wertz
7. J. Ponterotto
8. Sören Hjälm

Citations in the corpus

• Gender: An Intersectionality Perspective (2008, neutral): “Moreover, guides to qualitative research (e.g., Silverman 2001; Camic et al. 2003) encourage the investigator to choose research questions that explore constructs that are linked in language or in practice (hyphenated phenomena) in order to reveal the processes that create that linkage and the…”
• An interpretative phenomenological analysis of burnout and recovery in elite soccer coaches (2012, methodology): “Qualitative methods are also especially suitable in areas about which there is little or no prior knowledge (Camic et al. 2003).”