From Nudging to Budging: Using Behavioural Economics to Inform Public Sector Policy

By A. Oliver. Journal of Social Policy, 2013

150 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/706ebad21ab09b15aa090a3869abc09148da54a8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Robert Münscher
2. Max Vetter
3. M. Hallsworth
4. Thomas Scheuerle
5. Alexander Maedche
6. Dennis Hummel

In General Decision Sciences

1. Michael Sanders
2. Veerle Snijders
3. Robert Münscher
4. Max Vetter
5. M. Hallsworth
6. Thomas Scheuerle
7. Alexander Maedche
8. Dennis Hummel

In Safety Research

1. Michael Sanders
2. Veerle Snijders
3. M. Hallsworth

Citations in the corpus

• A Review of Nudges: Definitions, Justifications, Effectiveness (2020, unknown): “In addition to “genuine paternalism,” critics of libertarian paternalism argue in favor of a “no harm” (e.g., Oliver, 2013; Oliver, 2017) or “political” (Guala & Mittone, 2015) stance on nudges.”
• A Review and Taxonomy of Choice Architecture Techniques (2016, background): “marily relying on reflexive cognitive processes (Oliver, 2013) often referred to as cognitive biases or heuristics (Gigerenzer”
• Behavioural science and policy: where are we now and where are we going? (2018, background): “Several edited volumes on the topic are either in circulation or in press (Oliver, 2013; Shafir, 2013; Pykett et al., 2017).”