DOMESTIC PRODUCTION AND FOREIGN TRADE; THE AMERICAN CAPITAL POSITION RE-EXAMINED
By W. Leontief. 2016
327 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/706b0aed4a1403f77b1efe5c5e4472ac6e18e9d0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Richard Wood
- G. D. de Vries
- M. Timmer
- Moana S. Simas
- Arnaud Costinot
- Rodrigo Adão
- Edgar G. Hertwich
- S. Miroudot
Citations in the corpus
- Firms in international trade (2016, background): “In the third section, we take an empirical view of how exporting evolves over time and of how this may 4 Earlier tests of the Heckscher-Ohlin theorems include Leontief (1953), Leamer (1980), Trefler (1993, 1995), Davis and Weinstein (2001).”
- Functional specialisation in trade (2018, methodology): “Hummels et al. (2001) relied on a procedure that was originally developed by Leontief (1953).2 Using input–output tables for 14 countries compiled by the OECD, they found that vertical specialisation increased in all countries (except Japan), suggesting a widespread process of production…”
- Nonparametric Counterfactual Predictions in Neoclassical Models of International Trade (2017, background): “Since the seminal work of Leontief (1953), multiple generations of trade economists have combined input-output matrices with trade data to do so, but the high level of aggregation of such matrices leaves open the possibility of mismeasurement, a point emphasized more recently by Burstein and Vogel…”
- Labor Embodied in Trade (2015, background): “Work by Leontief (1953, 1956) showed that, paradoxically, despite being a capital-abundant economy, the U.S. exports in 1947 were far more labor intensive and less capital intensive than imports in the same year.”