The consequences of terrorism: disentangling the effects of personal and national threat

By L. Huddy, S. Feldman, Theresa Capelos, Colin Provost. 2002

331 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7068ad4c30c50bc370d9a9a7b3feb229aacd9d43

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. John T. Jost
2. Eran Halperin
3. Brian A. Nosek
4. D. Bar-Tal
5. Mahzarin R. Banaji
6. Smadar Cohen‐Chen
7. J. Cohrs
8. Daphna Canetti

In Sociology and Political Science

1. John T. Jost
2. Brian A. Nosek
3. Mahzarin R. Banaji
4. Eran Halperin
5. D. Bar-Tal
6. Smadar Cohen‐Chen
7. Daphna Canetti
8. A. Greenwald

Citations in the corpus

• Exposure to Violence, Ethos of Conflict, and Support for Compromise (2017, methodology): “Although the first relates to personal fear of the effects of violence, the latter relates to the fear that violence poses a danger to the legitimacy, resources, or values of one’s nation (Hobfoll et al. 2008; Huddy et al. 2002).”
• Terrorism Salience increases System Justification: Experimental Evidence (2007, background): “In contrast, 20% of Americans said in September 2001 that they, or someone in their family, knew someone who was missing, hurt, or killed in the 9/11 attacks (cf. Huddy et al., 2002b ).”
• Exposure to Political Violence and Political Extremism (2013, background): “10 Exposure to traumatic events can be defined as being physically proximal to an event or suffering direct physical harm, (Besser, Neria, & Haynes, 2009), being emotional proximal (Huddy et al., 2002) or both (Galea et al.”
• The Political Consequences of Perceived Threat and Felt Insecurity (2007, neutral): “In this instance, perceived personal threat motivated cautionary action over and above the effects of any perceived risk of terrorism to Americans more generally (Huddy et al 2002).”
• A Decade of System Justification Theory: Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the Status Quo (2004, background): “In a fifth study, Jost, Pelham et al. (2003) found that low-income respondents and African Americans were more likely than high-income respondents and European Americans to believe that economic inequality is both legitimate and necessary.”
• Emotions in Conflict: Correlates of Fear and Hope in the Israeli-Jewish Society (2008, neutral): “Recent studies have pointed to the different impact of personal and collective threats in reactions to conflict events ( Huddy, Feldman, Capelos, & Provost, 2002; Huddy, Feldman, Taber, & Lahav, 2005; Jacobson & Bar-Tal, 1995).”
• The Effects of Security Threats on Antecedents of Police Legitimacy (2011, background): “…protective behaviors on the individual level (such as caution in handling mail and minimizing the use of public transportation and air travel; see Huddy et al. 2002), but to also encourage support for protective measures by the government, such as increased surveillance and other policies that…”
• The Distinctive Effects of Empathy and Hope in Intractable Conflicts (2017, result): “As noted previously, most of these studies have concentrated on negative emotions, such as fear (Huddy et al. 2002; Lerner and Keltner 2001; Maoz and McCauley 2005; Rosler 2013; Wohl, Branscombe, and Reysen 2010), anger (Cheung-Blunden and Blunden 2008; Halperin and Gross 2011; Reifen-Teger et al.…”