Scale invariance vs conformal invariance
By Y. Nakayama. 2013
320 citations recorded by the source corpus.
In this review article, we discuss the distinction and possible equivalence between scale invariance and conformal invariance in relativistic quantum field theories. Under some technical assumptions, we can prove that scale invariant quantum field theories in d=2 space–time dimensions necessarily possess the enhanced conformal symmetry. The use of the conformal symmetry is well appreciated in the literature, but the fact that all the scale invariant phenomena in d=2 space–time dimensions enjoy the conformal property relies on the deep structure of the renormalization group. The outstanding question is whether this feature is specific to d=2 space–time dimensions or it holds in higher dimensions, too. As of January 2014, our consensus is that there is no known example of scale invariant but non-conformal field theories in d=4 space–time dimensions under the assumptions of (1) unitarity, (2) Poincare invariance (causality), (3) discrete spectrum in scaling dimensions, (4) existence of scale current and (5) unbroken scale invariance in the vacuum. We have a perturbative proof of the enhancement of conformal invariance from scale invariance based on the higher dimensional analogue of Zamolodchikov’s cc-theorem, but the non-perturbative proof is yet to come. As a reference we have tried to collect as many interesting examples of scale invariance in relativistic quantum field theories as possible in this article. We give a complementary holographic argument based on the energy-condition of the gravitational system and the space–time diffeomorphism in order to support the claim of the symmetry enhancement. We believe that the possible enhancement of conformal invariance from scale invariance reveals the sublime nature of the renormalization group and space–time with holography. This review is based on a lecture note on scale invariance vs conformal invariance, on which the author gave lectures at Taiwan Central University for the 5th Taiwan School on Strings and Fields.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/70667eb350308eead56cdbefcc330dafc610a460
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
- S. Rychkov
- David Poland
- A. Vichi
- David Simmons-Duffin
- B. C. Rees
- M. Paulos
- Clay Córdova
- K. Intriligator
In Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- David Simmons-Duffin
- David Poland
- S. Rychkov
- B. C. Rees
- A. Vichi
- M. Paulos
- A. Fitzpatrick
- Jared Kaplan
In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
- Clay Córdova
- S. Rychkov
- K. Intriligator
- David Poland
- T. Dumitrescu
- Abbas Ali Saberi
- B. C. Rees
- A. Vichi
Citations in the corpus
- Recent advances in percolation theory and its applications (2015, background): “How can thus conformal invariance to be enhanced from scale invariance? In two dimensions, one can rigorously show that scale invariance is enhanced to conformal invariance under the following assumptions [76, 252, 253]: i) unitarity, ii) Poincaré invariance (causality), iii) discrete spectrum in sc”
- Deformations of superconformal theories (2016, background): “See [3] for a review of what is known in other spacetime dimensions, and [4–9] for developments in d = 4.”
- Conformal invariance in the long-range Ising model (2015, background): “” 30 See [48] for a review and in particular [49–51] for recent nontrivial progress in 4d.”
- The conformal bootstrap: Theory, numerical techniques, and applications (2018, background): “2 See Polchinski (1988) and references therein, as well as the recent review by Nakayama (2015b).”
- EPFL Lectures on Conformal Field Theory in D ≥ 3 Dimensions (2016, background): “For recent work on scale vs conformal invariance see Luty, Polchinski and Rattazzi [11], Dymarsky, Komargodski, Schwimmer and Theisen [12], and the review by Nakayama [13].”