Scale invariance vs conformal invariance

By Y. Nakayama. 2013

320 citations recorded by the source corpus.

In this review article, we discuss the distinction and possible equivalence between scale invariance and conformal invariance in relativistic quantum field theories. Under some technical assumptions, we can prove that scale invariant quantum field theories in d=2 space–time dimensions necessarily possess the enhanced conformal symmetry. The use of the conformal symmetry is well appreciated in the literature, but the fact that all the scale invariant phenomena in d=2 space–time dimensions enjoy the conformal property relies on the deep structure of the renormalization group. The outstanding question is whether this feature is specific to d=2 space–time dimensions or it holds in higher dimensions, too. As of January 2014, our consensus is that there is no known example of scale invariant but non-conformal field theories in d=4 space–time dimensions under the assumptions of (1) unitarity, (2) Poincare invariance (causality), (3) discrete spectrum in scaling dimensions, (4) existence of scale current and (5) unbroken scale invariance in the vacuum. We have a perturbative proof of the enhancement of conformal invariance from scale invariance based on the higher dimensional analogue of Zamolodchikov’s cc-theorem, but the non-perturbative proof is yet to come. As a reference we have tried to collect as many interesting examples of scale invariance in relativistic quantum field theories as possible in this article. We give a complementary holographic argument based on the energy-condition of the gravitational system and the space–time diffeomorphism in order to support the claim of the symmetry enhancement. We believe that the possible enhancement of conformal invariance from scale invariance reveals the sublime nature of the renormalization group and space–time with holography. This review is based on a lecture note on scale invariance vs conformal invariance, on which the author gave lectures at Taiwan Central University for the 5th Taiwan School on Strings and Fields.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/70667eb350308eead56cdbefcc330dafc610a460

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. S. Rychkov
  2. David Poland
  3. A. Vichi
  4. David Simmons-Duffin
  5. B. C. Rees
  6. M. Paulos
  7. Clay Córdova
  8. K. Intriligator

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. David Simmons-Duffin
  2. David Poland
  3. S. Rychkov
  4. B. C. Rees
  5. A. Vichi
  6. M. Paulos
  7. A. Fitzpatrick
  8. Jared Kaplan

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. Clay Córdova
  2. S. Rychkov
  3. K. Intriligator
  4. David Poland
  5. T. Dumitrescu
  6. Abbas Ali Saberi
  7. B. C. Rees
  8. A. Vichi

Citations in the corpus