Critical Appraisal of Qualitative Research

204 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Child removal as the gateway to further adversity: Birth mother accounts of the immediate and enduring collateral consequences of child removal (2020, methodology): “7 Data collection and analysis adhered to recognised standards for robust qualitative research (Davis and Dodd, 2002; Daly et al., 2007; Hannes, 2011).”
Farmer Field Schools for Improving Farming Practices and Farmer Outcomes: A Systematic Review (2014, methodology): “In accordance with our inclusion criteria we filtered out studies of particularly low quality (Hannes, 2011) and studies where questions 1–5 on the checklist were assessed as “No” were excluded at this stage.”
Narrative approaches to systematic review and synthesis of evidence for international development policy and practice (2012, background): “There is a debate in the literature as to what constitutes the quality in qualitative research (Spencer et al. 2003), and this debate extends to the methodological literature on qualitative evidence synthesis (Hannes 2011; see also Snilstveit (2012)).”
Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence (2017, methodology): “Consistent with guidance from the Cochrane Qualitative Research Methods Group [25], we restricted the qualitative studies included to: empirical studies with a clear description of the sampling strategy, the data collection procedures and the type of data analysis used.”