Model estimates of M2 internal tide energetics at the Hawaiian Ridge

By Mark Merrifield, P. Holloway. 2002

199 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Tidal conversion at a very steep ridge (2003, methodology): “As an illustration, see figure 8 of Merrifield & Holloway (2002), which shows a simulation of Hawaiian tidal conversion: the emitted internal disturbances do not subsequently interact with the flanks of the ridge.”
Direct Breaking of the Internal Tide near Topography: Kaena Ridge, Hawaii (2008, unknown): “As the barotropic tide forces stratified water over topography, energy is lost principally in the generation of baroclinic waves (Merrifield and Holloway 2002; Klymak and Gregg 2004).”
Energetics of Barotropic and Baroclinic Tides in the Monterey Bay Area (2012, methodology): “Regions studied include the Northern British Columbia Coast (Cummins and Oey 1997), the Hawaiian Ridge (Merrifield et al. 2001; Merrifield and Holloway 2002; Carter et al. 2008), the East China Sea (Niwa and Hibiya 2004), the Monterey Bay region (Jachec et al. 2006; Carter 2010; Hall and Carter 2011”
Energetics of M2 Barotropic-to-Baroclinic Tidal Conversion at the Hawaiian Islands (2008, methodology): “By assuming that the 4-km flux divergence underestimates the generation over the Hawaiian Ridge as it does between Niihau and Maui, it is possible to extrapolate our results to the entire Merrifield and Holloway (2002) domain.”
Subtropical catastrophe: Significant loss of low‐mode tidal energy at 28.9° (2005, background): “Numerical [Merrifield and Holloway, 2002; Simmons et al., 2004b], historical in-situ [Rudnick et al.”