The ruby pressure standard to 150 GPa

By A. Chijioke, W. Nellis, A. Soldatov, I. Silvera. 2005

242 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Geophysics, Organic Chemistry, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/700fe7069796a7fd03e049efcfb6d193010a077b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Geophysics

1. Yang Ding
2. Lin Wang
3. Bing Li
4. H. Mao
5. Xiao-Jia Chen
6. V. Prakapenka
7. K. Syassen
8. W. Bassett

In Organic Chemistry

1. K. Syassen

In Statistics and Probability

1. K. Syassen

Citations in the corpus

• Solids, liquids, and gases under high pressure (2018, result): “Revisions by Holzapfel (2003) and others (Chijioke et al., 2005; Dorogokupets and Oganov, 2007) are consistent (Fig.”
• Ruby under pressure (2008, methodology): “[246,255] is more heavily based on revised RWSIs.”
• The COMPRES/GSECARS gas-loading system for diamond anvil cells at the Advanced Photon Source (2008, methodology): “Because the quasi-hydrostatic ruby pressure gauge [24] was calibrated using equations of state for Cu compressed in an Ar pressure medium, it is possible that a revised ruby pressure gauge is required for the softer helium medium in the 50–100 GPa pressure range [25,26].”