A Quantitative Assessment of the Sensitivity of Whole-Head MEG to Activity in the Adult Human Cortex

432 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Frequency-dependent functional connectivity within resting-state networks: An atlas-based MEG beamformer solution (2012, neutral): “In contrast , perhaps the size of a ROI should reflect the variations in sensitivity of MEG to neuronal activity in different regions of the brain (Hillebrand and Barnes, 2002).”
Translational principles of deep brain stimulation (2007, methodology): “The current density of MEG sensors has increased the method's sensitivity, and the spatial resolution is now comparable to that of fMRI (typically ∼5 mm 3 ), but with much better temporal resolution (in milliseconds”
Assessing and improving the spatial accuracy in MEG source localization by depth-weighted minimum-norm estimates (2006, background): “However, the sensitivity of MEG sensors is not uniform to sources across different cortical locations (Hillebrand and Barnes, 2002).”
A new generation of magnetoencephalography: Room temperature measurements using optically-pumped magnetometers (2017, background): “Moreover, many studies have shown how improvements in SNR give direct benefits in terms of spatial resolution in MEG (Brookes et al., 2008; Brookes et al., 2010; Gross et al., 2003; Hillebrand and Barnes, 2002; Troebinger et al., 2014a; Vrba, 2002).”