Phonological Rule-Learning and Its Implications for a Theory of Vowel Harmony

By Anne Pycha, Pawel M. Nowak, Eurie Shin, Ryan Shosted. 2003

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Surfeit of the Stimulus: Analytic Biases Filter Lexical Statistics in Turkish Laryngeal Alternations (2011, background): “The same-feature constraint figures prominently in the phonological literature, most recently with Moreton (2010), and before that in Pycha et al. (2003), Peperkamp et al. (2006), and others.”
Natural and Unnatural Constraints in Hungarian Vowel Harmony (2009, unknown): “…et al. 1974, Pertz & Bever 1975, Bailey et al. 1999, Jusczyk et al. 2002, Albright & Hayes 2003, Jusczyk et al. 2003, Pater & Tessier 2003, 2006, Pycha et al. 2003, Saffran & Thiessen 2003, Wilson 2003a, 2006, Pertsova 2004, Gilkerson 2005, Seidl & Buckley 2005, Kawahara 2006, Koo & Cole 2006,…”
Testing the role of phonetic knowledge in Mandarin tone sandhi* (2010, background): “Pycha et al. (2003) tested adult English speakers’ learning of three nonEnglish patterns – ‘palatal vowel harmony’ (stem and suffix vowels agree in [back]), ‘palatal vowel disharmony’ (stem and suffix vowels disagree in [back]) and ‘palatal arbitrary’ (an arbitrary relation between stem and suffix…”