Analysis of Linsker's application of Hebbian rules to linear networks
By David John Cameron MacKay, Kenneth D. Miller. 1990
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Kenneth D. Miller
- David John Cameron MacKay
- J. Urgen Schmidhuber
- Yoshua Bengio
- Zoubin Ghahramani
- Yarin Gal
- Sergey Levine
- Wulfram Gerstner
Citations in the corpus
- Deep learning in neural networks: An overview (2014, neutral): “…Amari, Cichocki, & Yang, 1996; Barlowet al., 1989;Dayan&Zemel, 1995;Deco&Parra, 1997; Field, 1994; Hinton, Dayan, Frey, & Neal, 1995; Linsker, 1988; MacKay & Miller, 1990; Plumbley, 1991; Redlich, 1993; Schmidhuber, 1992b, 1992c; Schraudolph & Sejnowski, 1993; Zemel, 1993; Zemel & Hinton, 1994).”
- The Role of Constraints in Hebbian Learning (1994, methodology): “Consider rst a simple equation for Hebbian synaptic plasticity, d dt w=Cw, where C is a matrix describing correlations among input activities (derived for example in MacKay and Miller, 1990a).”
- Analysis of Linsker's Simulations of Hebbian Rules (1990, background): “Several of the results are more general, applying to any covariance matrix Q. Space constrains us to postpone general discussion, technical details, and discussion of other model networks, to a future publication ( MacKay and Miller 1990 ).,... of saturation constraints, 2p will always dominate the ”