VLBI: A fascinating technique for geodesy and astrometry

By Harald Schuh, Dirk Behrend. 2012

259 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6fbc01c90b4b84546e0789cf380c3039100be3ae

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aerospace Engineering

1. Pasadena
2. Robert Heinkelmann
3. Heidelberg · Germany
4. C. Bizouard

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

1. O. Paris
2. C. I. O. Technology.
3. France.
4. Jet propulsion Laboratory
5. Pasadena
6. Bonn
7. Australia.
8. Usa

In Oceanography

1. S. Lambert
2. Robert Heinkelmann
3. C. Bizouard

Citations in the corpus

• The third realization of the International Celestial Reference Frame by very long baseline interferometry (2020, background): “The reason why the S/X band median position uncertainty is larger when comparing to the Gaia-CRF2 catalog than when comparing to the K band or X/Ka band catalog is that the common sources fall predominantly into the VLBAonly category in that comparison, unlike those involved in the K band and X/Ka b”
• The IERS EOP 14C04 solution for Earth orientation parameters consistent with ITRF 2014 (2019, methodology): “…pole coordinate provided along with the ITRF 2014 realization over 1993–2015 (Altamimi et al. 2016), and (ii) the latest quarterly combined solution for UT1 and nutation offsets provided by International VLBI Service for geodesy and astrometry (Schuh and Behrend 2012) and spanning over 1984–2016.”