THE “ACOUSTIC ADAPTATION HYPOTHESIS”—A REVIEW OF THE EVIDENCE FROM BIRDS, ANURANS AND MAMMALS

By Elodie Ey, Julia Fischer. 2009

343 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6fba0d7af55ce94f83ed7e9d0ca916708789a130

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental Biology

1. H. Brumm
2. David A. Luther
3. S. Zollinger
4. A. Horn
5. M. Leonard
6. H. Slabbekoorn
7. M. Ritschard
8. Yang Hu

In Ecology

1. H. Brumm
2. David A. Luther
3. M. Leonard
4. A. Horn
5. S. Zollinger
6. H. Slabbekoorn
7. M. Ritschard
8. Yang Hu

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. H. Brumm
2. David A. Luther
3. S. Zollinger
4. M. Leonard
5. A. Horn
6. M. Ritschard
7. H. Slabbekoorn
8. Yang Hu

Citations in the corpus

• Animal Communication and Noise (2013, background): “…and degradation during transmission through their natural habitats and thus increase contrast between signal and noise for a receiver (Morton 1975; Wiley and Richards 1982; Wiley 1991; Brown et al. 1995; Mitani and Stuht 1998; Boncoraglio and Saino 2007; Brumm and Naguib 2009; Ey and Fischer 2009).”