The Effect of Environmental Zoning and Amenities on Property Values: Portland, Oregon

By Noelwah R. Netusil. Land Economics, 2005

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The value of views and open space: estimates from a hedonic pricing model for Ramsey County, Minnesota, USA. (2009, unknown): “Some studies use dummy variables to indicate the presence or absence of open space areas within a specified distance of a property (Lutzenhiser and Netusil, 2001; Netusil, 2005).”
The Amenity Value of English Nature: A Hedonic Price Approach (2014, unknown): “…views (Benson et al., 1998; Patterson & Boyle, 2002; Luttik, 2000; Morancho, 2003), urban trees (Anderson and Cordell, 1985; Morales, 1980; Morales, Micha, and Weber, 1983) and open spaces (Cheshire and Sheppard, 1995, 1998; Bolitzer and Netusil, 2000; Netusil, 2005; McConnell and Walls, 2005).”
Landscape amenities and local development: a review of migration, regional economic and hedonic pricing studies (2010, background): “Positive effects were found for urban forests (Luttik, 2000; Mansfield et al., 2005; Netusil, 2005; Poudyal et al., 2009; Tyrväinen and Miettinen, 2000) or forest preserves (Thorsnes, 2002).”