The Media and the Public Sphere

By N. Garnham. 2020

312 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A slide fastener for installation on a garment wherein the carrier tapes carry layers of liquid activated adhesive such that the slide fastener can be temporarily held in place by moistening the layers of liquid activated adhesive prior to permanent installation of the slide fastener on the garment by sewing or by applying heat to layers of heat bondable adhesive carried on the carrier tapes.

Subfields: Communication, Urban Studies

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6f89553f59f28a1a3736cb255b03232faf05eae9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Natalie Fenton
2. Jurgita Matačinskaitė
3. Zizi Papacharissi
4. J. Downey
5. Lincoln Dahlberg
6. Louis Leung
7. Juho Hamari
8. Max Sjöblom

In Urban Studies

1. Natalie Fenton
2. Jurgita Matačinskaitė
3. Zizi Papacharissi
4. J. Downey

Citations in the corpus

• The Internet as a “Public Sphere” (2011, background): “Still, Garnham (1992) took a position defensive of Habermas, pointing out that his vision of the public sphere outlined a tragic and stoic pursuit of an almost impossible rationality, recognizing the impossibility of an ideal public sphere and the limits of human civilization, but still striving…”
• New Media, Counter Publicity and the Public Sphere (2003, background): “Furthermore, even if we wanted to recognize that this was activity operating contrary to the status quo, it does not avoid the problem that both the forms and the potential success of resistance can be determined by the system being resisted (Garnham, 1992).”
• Democracy online: civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups (2004, background): “To this end, Garnham (1992) pointed out that Habermas’s vision of the public sphere outlined a tragic and stoic pursuit of an almost impossible rationality, recognizing the impossibility of an ideal public sphere and the limits of human civilization, but still stoically striving toward it.”
• The virtual sphere (2002, background): “Still, Garnham (1992) took a position defensive of Habermas, pointing out that his vision of the public sphere outlined a tragic and stoic pursuit of an almost impossible rationality, recognizing the impossibility of an ideal public sphere and the limits of human civilization, but still striving…”