The syntax of ditransitives : evidence from clitics

406 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Causation, Obligation, and Argument Structure: On the Nature of Little v (2007, background): “…repaired (by.the mechanic) We do not have an account for this, but it may be related to the A-movement locality effects observed in Icelandic raising verbs with dative experiencers discussed byMcGinnis (1998), and in Greekwith dative clitics in double object constructions (Anagnostopoulou 2003).”
Clitic doubling or object agreement: the view from Amharic (2014, background): “…ways, sometimes including backwards pronominalization (see e.g. Suñer 1988:420ff. on Rioplatense Spanish; Alexiadou and Anagnostopoulou 1997; Anagnostopoulou 2003 on Greek; Harizanov 2014 on Bulgarian).18 This is not surprising: clitic doubling involves moving a pronoun-like element (the…”
Cross-linguistic and cross-categorial variation of datives* (2004, background): “I present evidence that constructions with se-goals qualify as prepositional ditransitives, while constructions in which the goal surfaces as a DP with genitive case are double object constructions (see also Anagnostopoulou 2003).”