A sustainability comparison between green concretes and traditional concrete using an emergy ternary diagram

By Yu Zhao, Miao Yu, Yinghui Xiang, Fanwen Kong, Lihong Li. 2020

65 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract The sustainable development of green concrete consumes as few natural resources as possible during production and uses and utilizes recyclable waste materials as raw materials. This study summarizes three modes of green concrete production: recycled aggregate concrete production mode, fly ash concrete production mode, and circular economy concrete production mode, as well as the system emergy flow of each mode of production, and presents emergy analysis methods for each mode. With the help of emergy ternary diagram auxiliary lines, the emergy ternary diagram expressions of three green concrete production modes and traditional concrete production modes are analyzed, respectively. The ternary diagram of emergy analysis directly reflects the resource allocation of the system. The relationship between the emergy utilization ratio and the indicators of the system is analyzed, and the sustainability of the existing concrete production system is evaluated comprehensively. The R-resource line corresponds to the environmental load ratio. The closer the R-resource line is to the F-axis, the greater the environmental pressure of the system. The N-resource line corresponds to emergy yield ratio and emergy investment ratio. The closer the N-resource line is to the N-axis, the greater the energy input-output efficiency of the system. The closer the N-resource line is to the “0” point of the R-axis, the higher the utilization rate of outsourced resources. In the emergy ternary diagram, it is evident that the circular economy concrete production mode is more sustainable than the other three concrete production modes. Combined with the analysis of the sensitivity line and sustainability line, it is predicted that the concrete production mode along the direction of the R-Sensitivity line is a sustainable development path.

Subfields: Building and Construction, Environmental Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6f812ecc3032b143a54ff0735055b9d2382b920d