Adversarial Example Defenses: Ensembles of Weak Defenses are not Strong

By Warren He, James Wei, Xinyun Chen, Nicholas Carlini, Dawn Song. 2017

246 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Ongoing research has proposed several methods to defend neural networks against adversarial examples, many of which researchers have shown to be ineffective. We ask whether a strong defense can be created by combining multiple (possibly weak) defenses. To answer this question, we study three defenses that follow this approach. Two of these are recently proposed defenses that intentionally combine components designed to work well together. A third defense combines three independent defenses. For all the components of these defenses and the combined defenses themselves, we show that an adaptive adversary can create adversarial examples successfully with low distortion. Thus, our work implies that ensemble of weak defenses is not sufficient to provide strong defense against adversarial examples.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Hardware and Architecture, Safety, Robustness & Interpretability, Signal Processing

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Matthias Hein
  2. Nicholas Carlini
  3. Michael I. Jordan
  4. Bernt Schiele
  5. Percy Liang
  6. Cho-Jui Hsieh
  7. Bo Li
  8. Dawn Song

In Hardware and Architecture

  1. Nicholas Carlini
  2. Bo Li
  3. Dawn Song
  4. Matthias Hein
  5. Cho-Jui Hsieh
  6. Huan Zhang
  7. Aleksander Madry
  8. Anish Athalye

In Safety, Robustness & Interpretability

  1. Matthias Hein
  2. Nicholas Carlini
  3. Aleksander Madry
  4. Cho-Jui Hsieh
  5. Florian Tramèr
  6. Huan Zhang
  7. Bo Li
  8. Michael I. Jordan

In Signal Processing

  1. Nicholas Carlini
  2. Bo Li
  3. Florian Tramèr
  4. Aleksander Madry
  5. Dawn Song
  6. Michael I. Jordan
  7. Nicolas Papernot
  8. Ajmal Saeed Mian

Citations in the corpus