A cohesive model of fatigue crack growth

By O. Nguyen, E. A. Repetto, Michael Ortiz, Raúl A. Radovitzky. 2001

450 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Mechanics of Materials

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6f61642771649e2c54a2897385f6f1189ad19c95

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

In Mechanics of Materials

Citations in the corpus

A fatigue degradation law for cohesive interface elements – Development and application to composite materials (2010, background): “Whilst formulations have been developed to account for damage under cyclic loading [20,21,22,23,24], these tend to”
Modeling 3D crack propagation in unreinforced concrete using PUFEM (2005, unknown): “An extension of cohesive models is given in [34], where unloading–reloading hysteresis for fatigue crack growth is taken into account.”
A cohesive model for fatigue failure of polymers (2005, methodology): “Cohesive modeling technique has been attempted for fatigue crack growth in metals [3,13,5,4], along interfaces [17] and in quasi-brittle materials [24].”
Methods for the prediction of fatigue delamination growth in composites and adhesive bonds: A critical review (2013, methodology): “used an exponential decay factor to reduce the stiffness and traction as a function of the number of cycles [176].”
Bounds for element size in a variable stiffness cohesive finite element model (2004, unknown): “[61], as reloading here follows the same path (AP in Figure 1(a)) as unloading.”
A crack tip tracking algorithm for cohesive interface element analysis of fatigue delamination propagation in composite materials (2012, methodology): “More recently the CZM approach has been further developed to model fatigue crack growth (Nguyen et al., 2001; Yang et al., 2001) and delamination propagation in composites under fatigue loading (Robinson et al.”
The influence of adhesive constitutive parameters in cohesive zone finite element models of adhesively bonded joints (2009, methodology): “The TTL is a widely used traction law (Hillerborg et al., 1976; Ungsuwarungsri and Knauss, 1987; Tvergaard and Hutchinson, 1992; Alfano and Crisfield, 2001; Nguyen et al., 2001; Sørensen, 2002; Xie and Waas, 2006; Xie et al., 2006; Sun, 2007; Gustafson and Waas, 2007, 2008).”
The Variational Approach to Fracture (2008, background): “The substitution remains unmotivated in the literature, with the exception of a few numerical experiments in the cohesive framework, as in [86] or in [89].”
Phase-field modeling of fluid-driven dynamic cracking in porous media (2019, methodology): “Typical discrete approaches exploit remeshing techniques as in [5–8], extended finite element method (XFEM) [9, 10], phantom-node method [11–13], cohesive element method [14, 15] or element-erosion method [16, 17].”
A generalized Paris' law for fatigue crack growth (2006, result): “A similar conclusion was obtained in relatively not well-known papers by Nisitani (1981) (see also Nisitani and Goto, 1987, and finally Nisitani et al., 1992) and Murakami et al. (1983).”
A scalable 3D fracture and fragmentation algorithm based on a hybrid, discontinuous Galerkin, Cohesive Element Method (2011, background): “A second class of cohesive methods fall under the so-called “extrinsic” approach in which cohesive elements are inserted at interelement boundaries only when a specified fracture criterion is met, (18; 19; 20).”