X-efficiency in Australian banking: An empirical investigation

By M. Sathye. 2001

463 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6f510edaf95680502167afb74abc0e602a0f94d1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Determinants of bank profitability in a developing economy: Empirical evidence from Bangladesh (2009, background): “Firstly, as suggested by Sathye (2001), the more highly qualifi ed and professional management may require higher remuneration packages and thus a highly signifi cant positive relationship with profi tability measure is natural.”
An Examination of Technical, Pure Technical, and Scale Efficiencies in Indian Public Sector Banks using Data Envelopment Analysis (2008, background): “Technical efficiency (TE) relates to the productivity of inputs (Sathye, 2001).”
Does economic freedom fosters banks’ performance? Panel evidence from Malaysia (2010, background): “A plausible explanation could be that the more highly qualified and professional management may require higher remuneration packages, thus a positive relationship with profitability measure is natural (Sathye, 2001).”
What Determines Differences in Foreign Bank Efficiency? Australian Evidence (2010, methodology): “Sathye (2001) applied Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to a sample of 29 banks operating in Australia in 1996 (17 domestic banks and 12 foreign banks) and concluded that there were no significant differences between domestic and foreign banks. Sturm and Williams (2004) employed a wider ranging study ”
Are foreign banks more profitable than domestic banks? Home- and host-country effects of banking market structure, governance, and supervision (2011, background): “Some studies have found that domestic banks perform better (Sturm and Williams, 2004) and that foreign banks are disadvantaged when compared to domestic banks in developed countries (Peek et al., 1999; Berger et al., 2000; Claessens et al., 2001; Sathye, 2001).”
Efficiency of banks in a developing economy: The case of India (2003, unknown): “(1995), Miller and Noulas (1996), Resti (1997) and Sathye (2001) 2.”
Efficiency and Risk in European Banking (2011, unknown): “29 This selection of inputs and outputs follows the studies by Sathye (2001) and Dietsch and Lozano (2000), Aly et al. (1990) and Hancock (1986), wherein the author develops a methodology based on user costs to determine the outputs and inputs of a banking firm.”
Impact of financial reforms on efficiency of state-owned, private and foreign banks in Pakistan (2010, unknown): “This is consistent with the results obtained, for example, by Sathye (2001) for Australian banks and Isik and Hassan (2002) for Turkish banks.”
The impact of bank regulations, supervision, market structure, and bank characteristics on individual bank ratings: A cross-country analysis (2006, unknown): “Peek et al., 1999; Hasan and Hunter, 1996; Demirguc-Kunt and Huizinga, 1999; Sathye, 2001; Claessens et al., 2001).”
Does corporate governance affect Australian banks' performance? (2016, background): “There is an increasing number of Australia-focused bank efficiency studies in the literature (see inter alia Walker, 1998; Avkiran, 1999 and 2000; Sathye, 2001; Neal, 2004; Sturm and Williams, 2004; Kirkwood and Nahm, 2006; Paul and Kourouche, 2008; Vu and Turnell, 2011).”
Determinants of bank efficiency: evidence from a semi‐parametric methodology (2009, background): “Yet, other studies showed that in highly concentrated markets, risk aversion prevails, rendering the relationship between efficiency and concentration negative (see e.g. Sathye, 2001).”