Relationship of sexual dimorphism in canine size and body size to social, behavioral, and ecological correlates in anthropoid primates
By W. Leutenegger, James T. Kelly. Primates, 2006
185 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6f4ef92ccce4a59206c343710115d8106d9c3ae6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Competitive regimes and female bonding in two species of squirrel monkeys (Saimiri oerstedi and S. sciureus) (2004, background): “In the literature on variation in primate sociality, much attention has been devoted to the effects of ecology on group composition and sex ratio (Crook 1972; Busse 1976; Leutenegger and Kelly 1977), and to the ecologial correlates of group size (DeVore 1963; Crook 1970; Clutton-Brock and Harvey 197”
- Why Liberals and Atheists Are More Intelligent (2010, background): “A speciestypical degree of polygyny correlates with the extent of sexual dimorphism in size; the more sexually dimorphic the species (where males are bigger than females), the more polygynous the species (Alexander et al. 1979; Leutenegger and Kelly 1977).”
- Beauty and the beast: mechanisms of sexual selection in humans (2010, background): “However, arboreality imposes no clear constraints on canine size, and selection in terrestrial species favoring larger canines for predator defense (Leutenegger & Kelly, 1977) should affect both sexes.”