NONLETHAL EFFECTS OF PREDATORS ON PREY POPULATIONS: PREDATOR‐MEDIATED CHANGE IN BIVALVE GROWTH

By M. Nakaoka. 2000

175 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6f325cddcc45e20d0ffaba1e7cd8669effa6c91f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. S. Peacor
2. Jonathan H. Grabowski
3. Sean Powers
4. John N. Kittinger
5. B. Beal
6. M. Kraus
7. M. Nakaoka

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Sean Powers
2. S. Peacor
3. Jonathan H. Grabowski
4. John N. Kittinger
5. B. Beal
6. M. Kraus

Citations in the corpus

• Hydrodynamic mediation of predator-prey interactions: differential patterns of prey susceptibility and predator success explained by variation in water flow (2002, background): “Hard clams have been shown to reduce feeding activity in the presence of whelk odors dispersed in the water column (Irlandi and Peterson, 1991; Nakaoka, 2000).”
• Plant–animal interactions in seagrass beds: ongoing and future challenges for understanding population and community dynamics (2005, background): “In these cases, individual clam growth rates were also low, resulting in positive correlation between growth and survivorship, regardless of habitat type (Nakaoka 2000).”
• Positive effect of predators on prey growth rate through induced modifications of prey behaviour (2002, background): “…have shown how predator presence can lead to a reduction in prey growth rate, indicating that the negative effect was stronger than the opposing indirect positive effect (e.g. Werner et al. 1983; Van Buskirk & Yurewicz 1998; Nakaoka 2000; Relyea 2000; McPeek et al. 2001; Peckarsky et al. 2001).”
• HABITAT COMPLEXITY DISRUPTS PREDATOR–PREY INTERACTIONS BUT NOT THE TROPHIC CASCADE ON OYSTER REEFS (2004, background): “Furthermore, when mortality is the only predator effect quantified, important sublethal effects such as siphon nipping, growth rate changes, and induced modifications in prey behavior might be ignored (Irlandi and Peterson 1991, Werner and Anholt 1996, Nakaoka 2000).”
• Interactive effects of initial size, stocking density, and type of predator deterrent netting on survival and growth of cultured juveniles of the soft-shell clam, Mya arenaria L., in eastern Maine (2002, background): “For shellfish aquaculturists, determining the smallest plantable-size seed that will return highest yields depends on knowledge about local predators and what decreases their foraging efficiency (Arnold, 1984; Boulding and Hay, 1984; Sponaugle and Lawton, 1990; Mansour and Lipcius, 1991; Irlandi, 19”