The 2016 Referendum, Brexit and the Left Behind: An Aggregate-level Analysis of the Result

By M. Goodwin, Oliver Heath. 2016

514 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6ee4d8c5cc3f61a4f9592e3c09e85108f2a8754d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Philip McCann
2. B. Los
3. R. Ortega-Argilés
4. Ron A. Boschma
5. Alessandra Faggian
6. Max Nathan
7. John Van Reenen

Citations in the corpus

• The mismatch between local voting and the local economic consequences of Brexit (2017, background): “Indeed, the findings from all the most detailed econometric work undertaken to date (Arnorsson & Zoega, 2016; Becker, Fetzer, & Novy, 2016; Goodwin & Heath, 2016; Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 2016; Zoega, 2016) all suggest that local economic conditions were the single most important factor driving…”
• Taking back control? Investigating the role of immigration in the 2016 vote for Brexit (2017, background): “…tended to be stronger in local authorities with larger than average numbers of pensioners, low-skilled workers and less well-educated citizens, it was also stronger in areas that had experienced a sharp rise in the number of EU nationals during the preceding 10 years (Goodwin and Heath, 2016).”
• Did Austerity Cause Brexit? (2019, unknown): “5A rich descriptive literature emerged since the Leave vote (see Hobolt, 2016; Goodwin and Heath, 2016; Becker et al., 2017), while (populist) campaigning and social media around the EU referendum are studied in a few papers (Gorodnichenko et al.”