The European rescue of the Washington Consensus? EU and IMF lending to Central and Eastern European countries

By Susanne Lütz, Matthias Kranke. 2014

190 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Development, Law, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6edb5158cefc0a620aba4a227f709e773840ea7f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Development

1. Ilene Grabel
2. Rainer Kattel
3. Dorothee Bohle

In Law

1. Ilene Grabel
2. Dorothee Bohle

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Ilene Grabel
2. Rainer Kattel
3. Dorothee Bohle
4. Ringa Raudla

Citations in the corpus

• Not Your Grandfather’s IMF: Global Crisis, ‘Productive Incoherence’ and Developmental Policy Space (significantly revised) (2011, background): “Interestingly, in cases involving European countries, the EU and the German government appear to be going even further than the IMF in regards to demands for fiscal austerity (Lütz and Kranke, 2010.]”
• The Baltic Republics and the Crisis of 2008–2011 (2013, background): “56See also Lütz and Kranke (2010) for interviews with the IMF staff.”
• European Integration, Capitalist Diversity and Crises Trajectories on Europe’s Eastern Periphery (2018, background): “…decision: while a number of internationally renowned economists and also the IMF team suggested that Latvia not stick to its currency peg but rather devaluate to regain competitiveness, the European Commission took a different stance, a position that ultimately prevailed (Lütz and Kranke 2014).”