Settling the score: variant prioritization and Mendelian disease

By Karen Eilbeck, Aaron R. Quinlan, Mark Yandell. 2017

217 citations recorded by the source corpus.

When investigating Mendelian disease using exome or genome sequencing, distinguishing disease-causing genetic variants from the multitude of candidate variants is a complex, multidimensional task. Many prioritization tools and online interpretation resources exist, and professional organizations have offered clinical guidelines for review and return of prioritization results. In this Review, we describe the strengths and weaknesses of widely used computational approaches, explain their roles in the diagnostic and discovery process and discuss how they can inform (and misinform) expert reviewers. We place variant prioritization in the wider context of gene prioritization, burden testing and genotype–phenotype association, and we discuss opportunities and challenges introduced by whole-genome sequencing.

Subfields: Genetics

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

  1. Juan Manuel Ramírez-Anguita
  2. Josep Saüch-Pitarch
  3. Ferran Sanz
  4. Nick V. Grishin
  5. Janet Piñero González
  6. Lisa N. Kinch
  7. Laura Inés Furlong
  8. Francesco Ronzano

Citations in the corpus