Restoration Potential in Seed Banks of Acidic Fen and Dry‐Mesophilous Meadows: Can Restoration Be Based on Local Seed Banks?

By Orsolya Valkó, P. Török, B. Tóthmérész, G. Matus. 2011

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6ecde436e6892e276e415545c086368182027a25

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. R. Gallagher
2. D. Venable
3. Peter Poschlod
4. A. Saatkamp
5. M. Zobel
6. K. Zobel
7. Z. Münzbergová
8. R. Pakeman

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. R. Gallagher
2. D. Venable
3. Peter Poschlod
4. A. Saatkamp
5. M. Zobel
6. K. Zobel
7. R. Pakeman
8. Z. Münzbergová

In Plant Science

1. M. Zobel
2. K. Zobel
3. Kersti Püssa
4. Rein Kalamees
5. Peter Poschlod
6. R. Gallagher
7. D. Venable
8. A. Saatkamp

Citations in the corpus

• Restoration potential of the persistent soil seed bank in successional calcareous (alvar) grasslands in Estonia (2012, background): “…because characteristic grassland species do not possess seeds that persist in the soil (in Europe: Davies & Waite 1998; Kalamees & Zobel 1998; Rosén & van der Maarel 2000; Kalamees & Zobel 2002; Bisteau & Mahy 2005; Bossuyt et al. 2006; Valkó et al. 2011; in North America: Stark et al. 2003).”
• The functional role of soil seed banks in natural communities. (2014, background): “Moreover, later successional species, which only regenerate when a minimum cover of vegetation already exists, will only be able to restore by later seed arrival; thus, persistent soil seed banks can only restore a part of the community (Kiefer and Poschlod, 1996; Bekker et al., 1997; Matus et al., ”