Experiences With Sexual Coercion in College Males and Females

By G. Forbes, L. Adams-curtis. 2001

123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6ecc1144f5220dd46869988c33450ef91a56f812

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. D. DiLillo
2. Sarah DeGue
3. E. Turner
4. G. Forbes
5. Amy E. Grubb
6. E. O’Neal

In Health

1. D. DiLillo
2. Sarah DeGue
3. G. Forbes
4. Amy E. Grubb

Citations in the corpus

• You would if you loved me: Toward an improved conceptual and etiological understanding of nonphysical male sexual coercion (2005, methodology): “Several researchers have utilized modifi ed versions of the SES or have developed their own measures of sexual misconduct (e.g., Forbes & Adams-Curtis, 2001, Tyler et al., 1998, Calhoun et al., 1997 and Lisak & Roth, 1988).”
• Attribution of blame in rape cases: A review of the impact of rape myth acceptance, gender role conformity and substance use on victim blaming (2012, background): “Therefore, women who do not behave in a manner consistent with the cultural stereotypes of a “good girl” will be more likely to be blamed for leading their partners on and will be regarded as deserving to be raped (Burt, 1980; Forbes & Adam-Curtis, 2001).”
• First- and Second-Generation Measures of Sexism, Rape Myths and Related Beliefs, and Hostility Toward Women (2004, background): “As expected (e.g., Forbes & Adams-Curtis, 2001; Malamuth, 1981), the measures from the Conflict Tactics Scale and the Sexual Coercion Scale were skewed.”